74 G.A.'s SME Credit Assessment Methodology

---

Methodology Overview 

The 74 G.A. SME Credit Assessment System evaluates the relative creditworthiness of small and medium-sized enterprises through a structured questionnaire completed by the business owner, manager, or authorized representative. The assessment is based on information voluntarily disclosed by the respondent and is not independently verified by 74 G.A. 

The methodology evaluates four core dimensions that are considered important determinants of SME creditworthiness: 

1. Industry Risk 
2. Business Risk 
3. Management Risk 
4. Financial Risk 

The objective is to assess the enterprise's capacity to sustain operations, generate cash flows, manage obligations, and maintain resilience through changing business conditions. 

1. Industry Risk Assessment 

Industry risk assesses the external environment in which the SME operates and the degree to which industry conditions may support or constrain business performance. 

Assessment Areas 

Industry Outlook 

Evaluation of the respondent's operating sector, including: 

• Expected growth prospects 
• Competitive intensity 
• Cyclicality 
• Exposure to economic shocks 
• Regulatory environment 

Demand Conditions 

Assessment of: 

• Stability of demand 
• Customer spending patterns 
• Market growth opportunities 
• Industry profitability trends 

Industry Positioning 

Assessment of: 

• The SME's role within its industry value chain 
• Dependence on specific industries or sectors 
• Exposure to concentration risks 

Assessment Method 

Information is obtained through questionnaire responses regarding the nature of the industry, principal markets served, customer sectors, and competitive conditions. 

2. Business Risk Assessment 

Business risk evaluates the sustainability and durability of the enterprise's business model. 

Assessment Areas 

Operating Track Record 

Assessment of: 

• Years in operation 
• Stability of operations 
• Growth history 
• Evidence of business continuity 

Customer Profile and Diversification 

Assessment of: 

• Number of customers 
• Dependence on key customers 
• Customer retention 
• Customer concentration 

Supplier Relationships 

Assessment of: 

• Availability of suppliers 
• Dependence on key suppliers 
• Procurement flexibility 
• Supply-chain resilience 

Market Reach 

Assessment of: 

• Geographic diversification 
• Export activity 
• Market expansion efforts 

Product and Service Diversification 

Assessment of: 

• Breadth of products and services 
• Dependence on a single product line 
• Ability to adapt offerings to market needs 

Operational Capability 

Assessment of: 

• Production capacity 
• Operational efficiency 
• Use of technology 
• Degree of process automation 
• Quality of facilities and equipment 

Assessment Method 

Assessment is based solely on respondent descriptions of customers, suppliers, operations, products, technology, and market presence. 

3. Management Risk Assessment 

Management risk evaluates the quality, capability, and sustainability of business leadership. 

Assessment Areas 

Management Experience 

Assessment of: 

• Years of industry experience 
• Entrepreneurial experience 
• Relevant qualifications 
• Business management expertise 

Strategic Planning 

Assessment of: 

• Clarity of business objectives 
• Growth strategy 
• Risk awareness 
• Business planning practices 

Organizational Structure 

Assessment of: 

• Defined management roles 
• Delegation of responsibilities 
• Presence of key personnel 
• Organizational depth 

Succession and Continuity 

Assessment of: 

• Existence of succession plans 
• Dependence on a single individual 
• Availability of second-tier management 

Governance and Controls 

Assessment of: 

• Record-keeping practices 
• Financial management systems 
• Internal controls 
• Formal business processes 

Assessment Method 

Management quality is assessed through questionnaire responses relating to experience, organizational practices, governance arrangements, and business continuity planning. 

4. Financial Risk Assessment 

Financial risk evaluates the enterprise's financial strength and capacity to meet obligations. 

Assessment Areas 

Business Size 

Assessment of: 

• Revenue scale 
• Asset base 
• Net worth 
• Employment size 

Profitability 

Assessment of: 

• Gross profit margins 
• Operating profitability 
• Net profitability 
• Profitability trends 

Leverage 

Assessment of: 

• Debt levels 
• Debt-to-equity relationships 
• Borrowing dependence 

Liquidity 

Assessment of: 

• Cash availability 
• Short-term financial flexibility 
• Access to funding sources 

Working Capital Management 

Assessment of: 

• Inventory management 
• Receivables collection 
• Payables management 
• Cash conversion cycle 

Debt Service Capacity 

Assessment of: 

• Interest servicing ability 
• Debt repayment capacity 
• Cash-flow adequacy 

Assessment Method 

Financial analysis is based on financial information provided through the questionnaire and/or uploaded financial statements. Unless specifically indicated, information is not independently verified by 74 G.A. 

Score Aggregation and Overall Assessment 

The overall credit assessment combines findings from: 

• Industry Risk 
• Business Risk 
• Management Risk 
• Financial Risk 

Each category contributes to an overall assessment of the SME's relative creditworthiness. The final assessment reflects both the strengths and vulnerabilities identified across the four dimensions. 

The methodology recognizes that SME performance is influenced by: 

• Industry conditions 
• Business model sustainability 
• Management capability 
• Financial strength 

Accordingly, strong performance in one area may be constrained by weaknesses in another. 

Methodology Limitations 

The 74 G.A. Credit Assessment System is based primarily on information self-reported by the SME through a guided questionnaire. Unless otherwise stated, information provided by respondents is not independently verified. 

Consequently: 

• Assessment results depend on the completeness and accuracy of information supplied. 
• The assessment does not constitute an audit, due diligence review, forensic investigation, or credit rating. 
• Results should be interpreted as an analytical assessment of credit-related characteristics based on declared information at the time of assessment.